<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - BMC</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>who is BoothMagnet?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-boothmagnet</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;England&#039;s Law: all social media channels degenerate into babble.&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;https://twitter.com/hashtag/pink14&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;#PINK14 twitter stream&lt;/a&gt; is following the rule.  BoothMagnet is brilliant satire of the vendor marketing social media mavens.  Sadly it is achieving that satire by trashing the twitter stream even more than the vendors are (marginally).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-boothmagnet&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/who-boothmagnet#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/232">social</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2352</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2352 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Remedyforce crap factoid alert</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/bmc-remedyforce-crap-factoid-alert</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/chokey_extreme.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;Image&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;100&#039; height=&#039;76&#039; /&gt;Nucleus Research have produced what is possibly the most outrageous &lt;a href=&quot;/crap&quot;&gt;Crap Factoid&lt;/a&gt; ever.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/bmc-remedyforce-crap-factoid-alert&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/bmc-remedyforce-crap-factoid-alert#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/crap">Crap Factoid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/nucleus">Nucleus</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2156</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2156 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BMC are at the old bait and switch again over CMDB</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-old-bait-and-switch-again-over-cmdb</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Chokey chokes!  Chokey the Chimp hasn&#039;t seen such a pile of Crap in a long time.  Take a look &lt;a href=&quot;http://datacenterjournal.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=3759:the-cmdb-as-the-brain-of-it-&amp;amp;catid=25&amp;amp;Itemid=100126&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;at this classic piece of vendor double-talk&lt;/a&gt;.  Tell them the joys of owning a MacLaren F1, then describe the value your Mum derived from buying  a new Daihatsu to get to the shops.  Yours for only a million dollars!  In fact this article isn&#039;t even describing a MacLaren: it is describing a Jetsons air-car with virtual hyperdrive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-old-bait-and-switch-again-over-cmdb&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-old-bait-and-switch-again-over-cmdb#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/crap">Crap Factoid</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1901</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1901 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is the best ITIL V3 or ITSM tool?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-best-itil-v3-or-itsm-tool</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We go round this question every week on LinkedIn.   My answer is getting pretty well honed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/what-best-itil-v3-or-itsm-tool&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/what-best-itil-v3-or-itsm-tool#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/19">software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/25">vendors</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1818</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1818 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BMC are ahead of their competitors in ITIL compliance</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-ahead-their-competitors-itil-compliance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[Updated 7th May: see below]  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s true folks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;BMC announce&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;BMC Software [NYSE: BMC] has been awarded the first “ITIL® Process Compliant” certification and trademark, achieving this important milestone ahead of any of its competitors&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-ahead-their-competitors-itil-compliance&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-ahead-their-competitors-itil-compliance#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/102">compliance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/198">SMCG</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1486</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 06:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1486 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crap Factoid Alert 370 percent ROI from ITSM</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alert-370-percent-roi-itsm</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Chokey the Chimp warns of a moderate Crap Factoid in the wild, with our old friends at BMC claiming a 370 percent ROI over 30 months on implementation of BMC&#039;s ITSM v7.  One would struggle to swallow that kind of number from any business case, but given BMC&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709&quot;&gt;recent high-level bullshitting&lt;/a&gt;, Chokey definitely calls &quot;CRAP!&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alert-370-percent-roi-itsm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/crap-factoid-alert-370-percent-roi-itsm#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/crap">Crap Factoid</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1273</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1273 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>BMC&#039;s own CMDB figures - The IT Skeptic </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075</link>
 <description>&lt;object type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; data=&quot;/sites/itskeptic.org/modules/audio/players/1pixelout.swf&quot; width=&quot;290&quot; height=&quot;24&quot; &gt;
  &lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;/sites/itskeptic.org/modules/audio/players/1pixelout.swf&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;param name=&quot;menu&quot; value=&quot;false&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;param name=&quot;quality&quot; value=&quot;high&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;param name=&quot;FlashVars&quot; value=&quot;soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.itskeptic.org%2Faudio%2Fplay%2F1075&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;embed src=&quot;/sites/itskeptic.org/modules/audio/players/1pixelout.swf&quot; flashvars=&quot;soundFile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.itskeptic.org%2Faudio%2Fplay%2F1075&quot; width=&quot;290&quot; height=&quot;24&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/object&gt; 9:32 minutes (3.83 MB)&lt;p&gt;A podcast of the original post &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot;&gt;a back-of-an-envelope re-analysis of Forrester and BMC&#039;s own CMDB research&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several readers argue well that ROI is not the right measure for a CMDB, but nevertheless management want to know what they get for their money, and BMC&#039;s own research suggests &quot;not much&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1075</wfw:commentRss>
 <enclosure url="http://www.itskeptic.org/audio/download/1075/bmc_cmdb_figures.mp3" length="4017462" type="audio/x-mpeg" />
 <itunes:duration>9:32</itunes:duration>
 <itunes:author>The IT Skeptic</itunes:author>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1075 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>a back-of-an-envelope re-analysis of Forrester and BMC&#039;s own CMDB research</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/1075&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[Updated June 2009: the paper, entitled &quot;The Total Economic Impact of the BMC Atrium CMDB Solution&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.cms.bmc.com/documents/TEI-CMDB-FINAL-version-2-21-08-V3.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;is here&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several readers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/712#comment-3241&quot;&gt;argue well&lt;/a&gt; that ROI is not the right measure for a CMDB, but nevertheless management want to know what they get for their money, and BMC&#039;s own research suggests &quot;not much&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/713#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/crap">Crap Factoid</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/713</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">713 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Crap Factoid Alert: CMDB savings of more than $1 million per year </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/528&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/itskeptic/imageskeptic/chokey_extreme.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;152&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;/node/722&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;background-color:red;&quot;&gt;This is a CATEGORY 1 Crap Factoid alert from Chokey the Chimp at the IT Skeptic&#039;s Crap Factoid Warning Service.  &lt;strong&gt;THIS IS NOT A DRILL&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;  Be on EXTREME danger alert for CF &quot;CMDB savings of more than $1 million per year&quot;.  BMC and Forrester are shovelling it. [Update: the IT Skeptic&#039;s own &lt;a href=&quot;/node/713&quot;&gt;assessment of the numbers  here&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/709#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/cmdb">CMDB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/crap">Crap Factoid</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/709</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">709 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Malcolm Fry swaps sides</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/413</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Malcolm Fry, who has been BMC&#039;s ITIL &quot;thought leader&quot; since they acquired Remedy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thinkhdi.com/hdi2008/session.aspx?SessionID=1015&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;is billed at&lt;/a&gt; the 2008 HDI conference as &quot;Executive Consultant to CA&quot;.   Seems he&#039;s been over to the dark side &lt;a href=&quot;http://itsmf-tampabay.org/WordPress/?p=78&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;for a little while&lt;/a&gt;.  Well well well.  I wonder what Beemer think about that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/413#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/117">CA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/413</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">413 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Magic happens.  BMC promise some magic ITIL.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/229</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;People want to believe that &quot;magic happens&quot; [why is that bumper sticker so often on cars that look like not much magic happened to them?].  Vendors know this and exploit it by selling magic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BMC&#039;s Ken Turbitt recently put out a paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bmc.com/USA/Communities/attachments/BMC_BPWP_ITIL.pdf&quot; target=&quot;new&quot;&gt;&quot;can you really get ITIL out of the box?&lt;/a&gt;&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/229&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/229#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/57">BMC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/229</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">229 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
