<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - guest post</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/328/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Open letter to ITIL Qualifications Board</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/open-letter-itil-qualifications-board</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today we have a guest post from Peter Gerritsen who has written a letter to the ITIL Qualifications Board proposing some changes to the ITIL V3 qualifications scheme.  I told him he has a snowflake&#039;s chance in Hell given what they went through to get the scheme to this point (I have plenty of experience of hammering on the doors of Castle ITIL).  We are interested in your views:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/open-letter-itil-qualifications-board&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/open-letter-itil-qualifications-board#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/guest-post">guest post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/61">V3</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1719</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pjotrg</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1719 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
