<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - root cause</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/285/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>No such thing as Root Cause</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/no-such-thing-root-cause</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve never really been comfortable with the concept of Root Cause.  It&#039;s time to be explicit: there is no such thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/no-such-thing-root-cause&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/no-such-thing-root-cause#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/285">root cause</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2465</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 03:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2465 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Conducting a root cause investigation on a 3rd party </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/conducting-root-cause-investigation-3rd-party</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear ITIL Wizard,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Our problem is this: We are being expected to conduct root cause on problems that impacted us but which are owned and maintained by 3rd parties who will also have their own Problem and Incident teams. This means spearheading investigation and exploring ways to remedy problems at another company! It&#039;s like sorting out your mate&#039;s wife&#039;s gambling addiction because it&#039;s making YOU have to fork out for John&#039;s beers whenever you go out! No, John should be telling YOU what he&#039;s doing to sort the problem out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/conducting-root-cause-investigation-3rd-party&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/conducting-root-cause-investigation-3rd-party#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/285">root cause</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2101</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Vespasian</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2101 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great paper on failure of complex systems</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/great-paper-failure-complex-systems</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is not often you read something that completely changes the way you look at IT.  This paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.mit.edu/2.75/resources/random/How%20Complex%20Systems%20Fail.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;How Complex Systems Fail&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; rocked me.  Reading this made me completely rethink ITSM, especially Root Cause Analysis, Major Incident Reviews, and Change Management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/great-paper-failure-complex-systems&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/great-paper-failure-complex-systems#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/285">root cause</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/systems">systems</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1541</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1541 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Defining terms in Root Cause Analysis - let&#039;s be clear what we mean</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/708</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/707&quot;&gt;a great discussion going&lt;/a&gt; regarding Root Cause.  As usual so much comes down to precise definition of terms.  What does Root Cause mean?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/708&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/708#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/157">problem</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/285">root cause</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/708</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">708 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Root Cause Analysis can&#039;t be done by machines</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/707</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Vendors are making a fuss about their Root Cause Analysis (RCA) features in their tools.  People Process Things once again: who says Root Cause is in the technology?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/707&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/707#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/157">problem</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/285">root cause</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/147">technology</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/707</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 03:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">707 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
