<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - CSI</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Agile continual improvement</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/agile-continual-improvement</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Pursuit of improvement can hurt innovation. Agility is not how fast you can go, it is how fast you can change. So endless optimisation through continual Improvement can misdirect you&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doug Tedder is one of a group of ITSM writers who write good sense. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.sysaid.com/blog/entry/the-curse-of-faster-better-cheaper#comment-10307&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;He writes:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/agile-continual-improvement&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/agile-continual-improvement#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/234">agile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/improvement">improvement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/nwowam">nwowam</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2601</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 21:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2601 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>revisiting agile CSI </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/revisiting-agile-csi</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lately I&#039;m realising that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/tipu&quot;&gt;my Tipu CSI method&lt;/a&gt; incorporated a lot of concepts being talked about these days :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/revisiting-agile-csi&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/revisiting-agile-csi#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/274">tipu</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2384</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2384 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An ITIL process is not a unit of work</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-process-not-unit-work</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I want to call out a key issue I see over and over again in organisations&#039; planning of their ITSM improvement (known as Continual Service Improvement or CSI - nothing to do with police forensics).  An ITIL process is not a unit of work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-process-not-unit-work&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-process-not-unit-work#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2343</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 04:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2343 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Improve first</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/improve-first</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Improve first.  Measure, plan, manage, define and standardise later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/improve-first&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/improve-first#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/measurement">measurement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2158</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2158 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eating the ITIL elephant one leg at a time </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/eating-itil-elephant-one-leg-time</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is ridiculously common for advice about ITSM to talk about which ITIL process to do first, or what order to do the processes in.  Even the official books &lt;i&gt;Planning to implement Service Management&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;ITIL Lite&lt;/i&gt; are built on the premise that an ITSM initiative is assembled from the ITIL processes.  Wrong wrong wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/eating-itil-elephant-one-leg-time&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/eating-itil-elephant-one-leg-time#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/274">tipu</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2061</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 11:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2061 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Tipu Framework</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-framework</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/thumbs/tipu.png&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot; style=&quot;float: left&quot; /&gt;Tipu is an approach to planning and executing service improvement. Find out more at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/tipu&quot; title=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/tipu&quot;&gt;http://www.basicsm.com/tipu&lt;/a&gt;.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tipu has its own Framework to allow us to organise our thinking and have something to compare other frameworks to.  All the ITSM philosophers who follow this blog will be interested in it: the Framework attempts to be more complete than ITIL or COBIT.   It is also intended to be a generalised &lt;b&gt;Service Management&lt;/b&gt; framework not an ITSM one.  There is no IT-specific content, in line with my new book &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/bsm-basic-service-management-book&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Basic Service Management&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  Your feedback is of course welcomed.  See what you can do with it - it is Creative Commons licensed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-framework&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-framework#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/274">tipu</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2082</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2082 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tipu: continual service improvement as a real approach to ITSM</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-continual-service-improvement-real-apporach-i</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At the recent itSMF Australian National Conference (a.k.a. LEADit, a top conference) I delivered a keynote on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/agile-itsm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Tipu, my &quot;agile ITSM&quot; approach&lt;/a&gt; to continual service improvement, which garnered some positive feedback.   The same day I was interviewed by the itSMF&#039;s journalist, and we spoke about CSI as an approach from the start; processes are the wrong granularity; how we must align to the business need; ETF and pragmatism; and most of all the need for change at a &lt;b&gt;human&lt;/b&gt; pace.  Here is that interview (7 minutes):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-continual-service-improvement-real-apporach-i&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/tipu-continual-service-improvement-real-apporach-i#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/274">tipu</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2069</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2069 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Continual Chunky Correction</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/continual-chunky-correction</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/thumbs/stormy_canstockphoto1583413.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;stormy&quot; style=&quot;float: left;padding:1em&quot; /&gt;What&#039;s with Continual Service Improvement?  Hardly anyone gets to incrementally improve in this millennium.  Gary and George did a good job of what they were asked to do with the fifth ITIL V3 book (CSI), but I think the whole ITIL framework misses the point.  The ITIL mindset seems to be that Change is all about getting things as stable as possible, and then CSI is about tweaking and refining and maturing the result.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/continual-chunky-correction&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/continual-chunky-correction#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/268">CSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2038</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2038 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
