<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - lean</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Limitations of the industrial manufacturing paradigm, including Lean and ToC.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/limitations-industrial-manufacturing-paradigm-including-lean-and-toc</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Be careful how we apply industrial manufacturing paradigms, including Lean and Theory of Constraints(ToC), to IT.  Linear stream flow models only work in IT (or, I suspect, manufacturing), at a close scale. Zoom out and they fail us, its not linear any more, not even to an approximation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/limitations-industrial-manufacturing-paradigm-including-lean-and-toc&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/limitations-industrial-manufacturing-paradigm-including-lean-and-toc#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/flow">flow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/toc">ToC</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2628</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 22:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2628 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lessons the world took from ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lessons-world-took-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL aspires to be customer-centric.  If only the reality matched the aspiration. If only the main lesson people took away from ITIL was customer value.  In practice I think the world takes away quite different lessons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is a bunch of awful fallacies that the world &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;actually&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; took from ITIL:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lessons-world-took-itil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lessons-world-took-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/234">agile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/kamu">Kamu</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2576</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2576 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>images of Lean</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/images-lean</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here are some graphics of Lean which I created.   Enjoy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/Lean removes_1.png&#039; alt=&#039;Image&#039;  class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;100&#039; height=&#039;75&#039; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/images-lean&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/images-lean#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2558</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2017 01:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2558 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DevOps has three parents: Lean, Agile, and ITSM</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-has-three-parents-lean-agile-and-itsm</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;DevOps synthesises three bodies of knowledge: Lean, Agile, and ITSM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-has-three-parents-lean-agile-and-itsm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-has-three-parents-lean-agile-and-itsm#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/234">agile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2531</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2531 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Get out of the way</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/get-out-way</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A basic principle of DevOps is for &quot;Necessary Non-Value Work&quot; to get out of the way of Value Work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/gatekeepers_canstockphoto17150410.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Copyright canstockphoto.com&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039;  height=&#039;200&#039; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Require-to-Deploy value stream, this NNVW includes
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;security
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;architecture&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/get-out-way&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/get-out-way#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/workflow">workflow</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2497</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 22:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2497 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Railroads don&#039;t have a batch size of 1</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/railroads-dont-have-batch-size-1</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lean theory tells us that the optimal batch size is 1 [update: no it doesn&#039;t. Optimal batch size is often 1, especially in a manufacturing context.]&lt;br /&gt;
i.e. we perform each unit of work on demand and it flows independently through the value stream.&lt;br /&gt;
Certainly that is the case when you order one of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/books&quot; &gt;my books&lt;/a&gt; which are printed on demand individually and posted directly to you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/diesel loco.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;Image&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;400&#039; height=&#039;300&#039; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I am still learning about systems and flow.  Some of you will know that I am a train nut: I like railways.  So it puzzled me to read an article recently in Trains magazine about the trend to larger trains, which have increased by a factor of 100 over the last 150 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/railroads-dont-have-batch-size-1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/railroads-dont-have-batch-size-1#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2509</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 04:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2509 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Challenging the operational rites</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/challenging-operational-rites</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Over time a strange set of rites and rituals grow up around the Require-to-Deploy value stream*.  Some of them are there to protect the quality of the output but others have ceased to add value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/value stream.png&#039; alt=&#039;Image&#039;  class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;400&#039; height=&#039;322&#039; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/challenging-operational-rites&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/challenging-operational-rites#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2492</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2016 04:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2492 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IT service build is not a factory</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/information-technology-not-manufacturing</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a widespread idea in IT that IT is a factory, repeatably turning out code which can be treated as identical products on some kind of optimisable production line.  This is only true for parts of our IT world: e.g. standard requests, standard incidents and changes, bug fixes.  It&#039;s usually not true of building IT services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/information-technology-not-manufacturing&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/information-technology-not-manufacturing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/171">service improvement</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2360</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2360 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The applicability of factory-floor techniques to IT</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/applicability-factory-floor-techniques-it</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/book-review-phoenix-project&quot;&gt;my review of &lt;i&gt;The Phoenix Project&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; I questioned the applicability of factory-floor techniques to IT. There is potential to be exploited there - hence I recommended everyone read the book - but we can go too far with the application of Lean, TQM, Six Sigma etc to IT.  Manufacturing techniques are only partly applicable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/applicability-factory-floor-techniques-it&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/applicability-factory-floor-techniques-it#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/244">quality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/standardcase">Standard+Case</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2231</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2231 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lean IT and ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One sees a few remarks in the webisphere that suggest folk don&#039;t get the relationship between Lean IT and ITIL &lt;small&gt;(thanks to my friend Bob Grinsell, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realitsm.com/EgoITSM&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;RIPOFF #1&lt;/a&gt;, for reminding me of this issue by his comment on the itSMF USA forum)&lt;/small&gt;.  Lean is a method.  ITIL is a framework.  These are different things for different purposes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/lean-it-adn-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/10">best practice</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2083</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2083 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Agile and Lean need Renaissance Man</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/agile-and-lean-need-renaissance-man</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Agile and Lean both seem to be based on idealistic, some would say naive, assumptions about human nature and capabilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/agile-and-lean-need-renaissance-man&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/agile-and-lean-need-renaissance-man#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/234">agile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/236">cowboys</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2017</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 03:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2017 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
