<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - free ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/260/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>OGC stay one step ahead of government policy in their commercialisation of ITIL.  Better news for PRINCE2</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/ogc-stay-one-step-ahead-government-policy-their-co</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Playing &quot;bush lawyer&quot;, I have been tracking down the terms under which OGC control the copyright to ITIL (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-intellectual-property&quot;&gt;discussed here recently&lt;/a&gt;).  And it makes an interesting little story: ITIL was almost free.  And I think maybe PRINCE2 is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/ogc-stay-one-step-ahead-government-policy-their-co&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/ogc-stay-one-step-ahead-government-policy-their-co#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/126">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/260">free ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1774</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1774 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
