<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - support</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/257/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Cynefin model of ITSM support levels</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cynefin-model-itsm-support-levels</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Cynefin model&lt;/a&gt; is a useful model for thinking about the situation you are in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cynefin-model-itsm-support-levels&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cynefin-model-itsm-support-levels#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/adaptive-case">adaptive case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/standard-case">Standard Case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/257">support</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2472</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 19:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2472 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In service support, changing the channel changes little</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/service-support-changing-channel-changes-little</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m all for improving the support channels, and social media can do that.  But don&#039;t confuse that with any fundamental change in how we do - and ought to do - service support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/service-support-changing-channel-changes-little&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/service-support-changing-channel-changes-little#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/232">social</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/257">support</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2252</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2252 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Improving service support for Real IT</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/improving-service-support-real-it</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think all ITSM practitioners know exactly what idealised service support looks like.  It&#039;s all well and good painting these idealised dream pictures. The value comes in describing how to get there.  There are certain obstacles:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/improving-service-support-real-it&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/improving-service-support-real-it#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/realit">RealIT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/257">support</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2266</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 09:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2266 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Standard+Case approach: applying Case Management to ITSM</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/standard-case</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/rock_split_canstockphoto4691015.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;Image ©canstockphoto.com&#039; title=&#039;Image ©canstockphoto.com&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;200&#039; height=&#039;134&#039; /&gt;Here is an exciting new approach to categorising and resolving any sort of activity &quot;tickets&quot;, such as requests (including incidents) on a service desk, problems, or changes. It is called Standard+Case until somebody comes up with a better name.  I know there is so much to read these days, but if you have anything to do with service support or change management, read this.  It&#039;ll change your year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Standard+Case is a synthesis of our conventional &quot;Standard&quot; process-centric approach to responding, with Case management, a discipline well-known in some other industry sectors such as health, social work, law and policing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;iframe style=&quot;width:120px;height:240px;float:right&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; src=&quot;//ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&amp;amp;OneJS=1&amp;amp;Operation=GetAdHtml&amp;amp;MarketPlace=US&amp;amp;source=ss&amp;amp;ref=as_ss_li_til&amp;amp;ad_type=product_link&amp;amp;tracking_id=thitsk-20&amp;amp;marketplace=amazon&amp;amp;region=US&amp;amp;placement=1482061740&amp;amp;asins=1482061740&amp;amp;linkId=5a46e16b39a212303a499663ff246979&amp;amp;show_border=true&amp;amp;link_opens_in_new_window=true&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;S+C addresses criticisms of approaches like ITIL for being too process-centric and not allowing customers and knowledge workers to be empowered.  S+C does not seek to replace or change ITIL or other theory: it expands and clarifies that theory to provide a more complete description of managing responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It provides a good skills path for service desk analysts that fits well with gamification. And Standard+Case is applicable to Problem Management and Change Management (and Event Management...) as well as Service Desk activities.  S+C applies to anything that requires a human response: there&#039;s either a standard response or there isn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;big&gt;For more information about Standard + Case, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.basicsm.com/standard-case&quot;&gt;the Basic Service Management website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/standard-case&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/standard-case#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/case">case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/153">change</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/184">incident</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/182">request</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/standard-case">Standard Case</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/257">support</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2154</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2154 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>User self-help - a skeptical view</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/user-self-help-skeptical-view</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Continuing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/social-itsm-skeptical-view&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;our debate about social media&lt;/a&gt; it occurred to me what a load of bollocks this idea is that users are going to support each other without a service desk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/user-self-help-skeptical-view&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/user-self-help-skeptical-view#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/232">social</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/257">support</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2119</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2119 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Getting IT development to support production - a people problem </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/getting-it-development-support-production-people-p</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A LinkedIn discussion which I have now lost (LinkedIn having one of the worst search capabilities on the planet) asked about how to get Development to provide Level 3 support to Production incidents.  It&#039;s a people problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/getting-it-development-support-production-people-p&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/getting-it-development-support-production-people-p#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/124">culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/257">support</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1806</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1806 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
