<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - CMM</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What to think of the ISACA acquisition of CMMI?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-think-isaca-acquisition-cmmi</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure what to think of ISACA&#039;s acquisition of the CMMI Institute.  I don&#039;t see it addressing their major issue of failure to expand constituency.   What are your views?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-think-isaca-acquisition-cmmi&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-think-isaca-acquisition-cmmi#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2483</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2016 00:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2483 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITSM&#039;s fixation with capability maturity</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsms-fixation-capability-maturity</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The ITSM community seems to have some fixation with assessing capability maturity, or worse still process management maturity.  These are only indirect predictors for what matters: risk and cost-benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/itsms-fixation-capability-maturity&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/itsms-fixation-capability-maturity#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1979</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 21:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1979 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CMM is back to front</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cmm-maturity-not-useful-concept-it-world</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think that CMM is back to front.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cmm-maturity-not-useful-concept-it-world&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cmm-maturity-not-useful-concept-it-world#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1955</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1955 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Process maturity is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for improving service.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/process-maturity-neither-necessary-nor-sufficient-</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday we looked at how &lt;a href=&quot;/node/1746&quot;&gt;CMM-type maturity is not a measure&lt;/a&gt; of how well you are delivering service.    CMM only measures sophistication of management, and actually only sophistication of empirical management.  The corollary is that maturity assessments are not a measure of whether an improvement exercise was successful, not if the objective was to improve quality of service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But wait!  there&#039;s more!  Mature management-by-numbers of process is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for improving service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/process-maturity-neither-necessary-nor-sufficient-&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/process-maturity-neither-necessary-nor-sufficient-#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/9">cult</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1748</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1748 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Practice maturity is a measure of management not performance</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/practice-maturity-measure-management-not-performan</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Explaining the basic CMM 5-level model today I was reminded of a common misunderstanding about maturity: it measures how sophisticated or smart or advanced you are at managing a practice or process; it doesn&#039;t measure how well you are doing it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/practice-maturity-measure-management-not-performan&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/practice-maturity-measure-management-not-performan#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/174">maturity</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1746</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1746 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
