<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - VHP</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/228/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s official - ITIL is a commercial product</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/its-official-itil-commercial-product</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is clear from reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/van-haren-publishing-and-the-office-of-government-commerce.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a recent complaint report from the British Government agency OPSI&lt;/a&gt; (the Office of Public Sector Information,&lt;br /&gt;
part of the National Archives) that OGC and Van Haren Publishing aren&#039;t best mates any more. VHP allege a number of non-competitive practices, most of which OGC managed to duck as being outside the scope of OPSI&#039;s remit.  Read the report yourself for the detail, but I take some interesting points from it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/its-official-itil-commercial-product&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/its-official-itil-commercial-product#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/227">OPSI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/228">VHP</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1889</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1889 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
