<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - gartner</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>My apologies to Forrester</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/chick_in_egg_canstockphoto11513840.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Copyright Canstock Photo Inc&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;65&#039; height=&#039;100&#039; /&gt;Oops, sorry.  I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated&quot;&gt; accused Forrester of&lt;/a&gt; repeatedly doing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/chicken-itle&quot;&gt;Chicken ITle&lt;/a&gt; articles, when in fact only the latest one was by Forrester and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/2258&quot;&gt;previous instance&lt;/a&gt; - on Service Desk - was  Gartner &lt;i&gt;Killing the Help Desk Softly - or Blowing It Up&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle">Chicken ITle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223">gartner</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2290</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2290 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chicken ITle calls out the end of Service Desk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/chicken-itle</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/chicken_ITle_canstockphoto11513845.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Can Stock Photo &#039;  class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;81&#039; height=&#039;100&#039; style=&quot;float:left;margin:1em;&quot; /&gt;As part of my ongoing theme of Slow IT, I&#039;m introducing a new character to the blog, Chicken ITle (how appropriate just before Easter).  Chicken ITle draws our attention to those who announce catastrophic consequences for IT if we don&#039;t all rush off and do something.  Usually these sky-falling folk are either analysts or vendors, because both profit from fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/chicken-itle&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/chicken-itle#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle">Chicken ITle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223">gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/slow">slow</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2258</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2258 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Examining the 2012 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Service Desk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/examining-2012-gartner-magic-quadrant-service-desk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Gartner have released a new Magic Quadrant for service desk.  Get it from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gartner.com/technology/reprints.do?id=1-1BS56X7&amp;amp;ct=120821&amp;amp;st=sb&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;BMC&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://eloquaresponse.easyvista.com/GartnerITSSMMQ&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;EasyVista&lt;/a&gt; (reg req).  It is delightfully challenging (for a skeptic) but also disappointing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/examining-2012-gartner-magic-quadrant-service-desk&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/examining-2012-gartner-magic-quadrant-service-desk#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223">gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2180</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 02:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2180 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why are the analysts dumping IT Service Desk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-are-analysts-dumping-it-service-desk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I heard it first on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ServiceSphere&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;@ServiceSphere&#039;s tweets&lt;/a&gt;.   The analysts are losing interest in IT Service Desk tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-are-analysts-dumping-it-service-desk&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-are-analysts-dumping-it-service-desk#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223">gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2021</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2021 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Even Gartner say ITIL adoption is limited and falling</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/even-gartner-say-itil-adoption-limited-and-falling</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic rails against &lt;a href=&quot;/crap&quot;&gt;Crap Factoids &lt;/a&gt; often enough.  They&#039;re rubbish.  They&#039;re even funnier when the results undermine the position of the hype-merchants keen to push them.  Everyone waves around Gartner&#039;s numbers in support of their own positions, blithely ignoring the fact that Gartner just pull these statistics out of their own ...ahem... analyst.  I don&#039;t see any of the ITIL zealots &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gartner.com/it/content/992200/992214/june17_itil_itoperations_ed_holub_final.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;quoting this set though&lt;/a&gt;.  Check out slide 7 &quot;Polling Results: Characterization of ITIL Adoption&quot;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/even-gartner-say-itil-adoption-limited-and-falling&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/even-gartner-say-itil-adoption-limited-and-falling#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223">gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1890</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 09:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1890 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
