<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - CobiT</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What to think of the ISACA acquisition of CMMI?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-think-isaca-acquisition-cmmi</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure what to think of ISACA&#039;s acquisition of the CMMI Institute.  I don&#039;t see it addressing their major issue of failure to expand constituency.   What are your views?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-think-isaca-acquisition-cmmi&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-think-isaca-acquisition-cmmi#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/248">CMM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2483</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2016 00:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2483 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Copyright issues when using ITIL at the coalface </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/copyright-issues-when-using-itil-coalface</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Axelos are shooting themselves in the foot by constraining consultants&#039; use of ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/copyright-issues-when-using-itil-coalface&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/copyright-issues-when-using-itil-coalface#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/126">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2438</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 10:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2438 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ISACA&#039;s strategy and missed opportunity</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/isacas-strategy-and-missed-opportunity</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;is ISACA missing its window of opportunity to own the IT practices space?  To be THE body of knowledge, the one ring to rule them all...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/isacas-strategy-and-missed-opportunity&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/isacas-strategy-and-missed-opportunity#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/practice">practice</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2427</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 22:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2427 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL Intellectual Property under the new Axelos regime</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-intellectual-property-under-new-axelos-regime</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Axelos has published Intellectual Property (copyright and trademark) guidance for ITIL, PRINCE2 and the rest of the &quot;Swirl suite&quot;.  Unintelligible Property guidance, more like.  Combine it with worrying signs that Axelos want to start shaking down the consulting industry for dollars and it doesn&#039;t look good for we consultants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-intellectual-property-under-new-axelos-regime&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-intellectual-property-under-new-axelos-regime#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2309</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 07:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2309 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ISACA&#039;s long cultural road</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/isacas-long-cultural-road</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Will ISACA ever shed the audit-and-security culture and embrace a more general IT practitioner orientation as hinted  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/isacas-new-strategy-cobit-and-its-future-impact-it&quot;&gt;by Lynn Lawton four years ago now&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can COBIT ever be more than a sideshow if they don&#039;t? No.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/isacas-long-cultural-road&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/isacas-long-cultural-road#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2248</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 09:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2248 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Where&#039;s the COBIT 5 training?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/wheres-cobit-5-training</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here we go again.  COBIT 5 is hot: the industry itches to get using it.  APMG is signed up to roll out the training programme.  The ITIL V3 training courses faced a similar situation a few years back.  The ITIL training courses (also administered by APMG) came out later than promised, much to the frustration of an industry busting to put it to work.  Now we see the same thing again with COBIT 5.  Rattle your dags, ISACA and APMG!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/wheres-cobit-5-training&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/wheres-cobit-5-training#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2247</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2247 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Interpreting COBIT licensing</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit-licensing</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A reader asked about apparently contradictory information on COBIT licensing requirements for consultants.  Here is my interpretation:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit-licensing&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit-licensing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2219</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2219 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Breaking news: APMG to accredit COBIT5 training industry.  Fort COBIT?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/breaking-news-apmg-accredit-cobit5-training-industry-fort-cobit</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt; In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isaca.org/About-ISACA/Press-room/News-Releases/2012/Pages/ISACA-Partners-With-APMG-to-Issue-New-COBIT-5-Training-Courses-and-Accreditation-Program.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a press release today&lt;/a&gt;, ISACA announced&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Four new COBIT 5 training courses will be launched over the next five months as the result of a new partnership between ISACA and APMG-International.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/breaking-news-apmg-accredit-cobit5-training-industry-fort-cobit&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/breaking-news-apmg-accredit-cobit5-training-industry-fort-cobit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/49">APMG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2171</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2171 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT5</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit5</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;COBIT5 is a very very important development for the IT industry.  It deserves more attention.  It may even be The Next Big Thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit5&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit5#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1870</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1870 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More Future of IT Management</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/more-future-it-management</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/swami_white_canstockphoto0794552.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;The IT Swami&#039;  class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;100&#039; height=&#039;96&#039; style=&quot;float:right;&quot; /&gt;In which the IT Swami updates his vision of the future of ITSM and the IT Skeptic looks forward to upcoming conferences.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/more-future-it-management&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/more-future-it-management#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/governance">governance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/115">Swami</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2151</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2151 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Governors govern</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/101&quot;&gt;said it before on this blog a number of times&lt;/a&gt; but it bears repeating: governors govern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/governors-govern#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/governance">governance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/277">ISO38500</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/177">terminology</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2148</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 22:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2148 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why COBIT wins in a showdown with ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/why-cobit-wins-showdown-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/gunslinger_canstockphoto5773797.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;Image&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;100&#039; height=&#039;85&#039; /&gt;I like ITIL.  I use it quite a bit. But it puzzles me why ITIL is the default source of &lt;strike&gt;best&lt;/strike&gt;good, generally accepted practice for IT &lt;strike&gt;processes&lt;/strike&gt;practices.  Often people talk as if it is the only source.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My default source of IT good practice is COBIT.  It wins over ITIL, hands down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/why-cobit-wins-showdown-itil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/why-cobit-wins-showdown-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/27">ISO20000</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2138</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 01:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2138 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT 5 copyright terms confirmed.  And the name may be used.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit-5-copyright-terms-confirmed-and-name-may-be-used</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not long ago, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/difference-between-itil-and-cobit-consultants-four&quot;&gt;I blogged about how COBIT 5&lt;/a&gt; looked like it would be a  much more accessible framework for consultants to use, without the restraints of ITIL.  It is true.  Castle ITIL should take note, but will they?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit-5-copyright-terms-confirmed-and-name-may-be-used&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/cobit-5-copyright-terms-confirmed-and-name-may-be-used#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2142</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2142 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT 5 will be released in April </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-will-be-released-april</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ISACA have announced to members that COBIT 5 will be released in &quot;mid-April&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The release includes three publications:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;COBIT 5 (Framework)
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;COBIT 5: Enabling Processes
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;COBIT 5 Implementation
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...and a &quot;toolkit&quot;, an undefined &quot;set of resources&quot;.  I smell spreadsheets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cost to ISACA members for the pdf version?  Nada.  Free.  Suck on that Cabinet Office/TSO/itSMF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And ISACA is providing a separate download server for members so as not to have to compete for bandwidth with the great unwashed masses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-will-be-released-april&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-will-be-released-april#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2127</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2127 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The difference between ITIL and COBIT for consultants: four words</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/difference-between-itil-and-cobit-consultants-four</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As a consultant, COBIT is my first-choice body of knowledge for my engagements.   I go to it first* to assess, to frame, to define, to justify, to audit.  I turn to ITIL second, when I need more detail, or when I need the authority of the holy of holies to justify what I suggest.  There are two reasons for this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/difference-between-itil-and-cobit-consultants-four&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/difference-between-itil-and-cobit-consultants-four#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/204">consulting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2106</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2106 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT 5: muddying governance and management</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-muddying-governance-and-management</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Execution always falls short of expectation. I&#039;m still pondering my impressions of COBIT5 - more on that later - but one thing is clear: they haven&#039;t fully fixed the governance/management thing. [Update: I didn&#039;t get this right, see comments below]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-muddying-governance-and-management&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-muddying-governance-and-management#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/governance">governance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/278">Infonomics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/277">ISO38500</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2056</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2056 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A study in governance: comparing Castle ITIL with ISACA</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/study-governance-comparing-castle-itil-isaca</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is always illuminating to use COBIT as a benchmark to study ITIL.  In recent days, ISACA has announced another solid Board, whilst itSMF continues its infighting (see below), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/how-many-itil-examination-institutes-enough&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;APMG expands its empire&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/what-does-it-mean-when-there-second-edition-core-i&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;TSO goes its own merry way&lt;/a&gt; unanswerable, and OGC tightens control over - and profit from - what everyone thought was public property (blog coming if I can ever unravel it all).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/study-governance-comparing-castle-itil-isaca&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/study-governance-comparing-castle-itil-isaca#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1878</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1878 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT5 another step closer... to ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit5-another-step-closer-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;COBIT5 is coming along.   The first(?) development workshop is over and the next is in August, not far away!  For those of you who haven&#039;t got your head around the next generation of COBIT, you need to.  I grow weary reiterating that COBIT is not for auditors.   &lt;strong&gt;COBIT is good for management, governance-enablement, design, assessment... and audit&lt;/strong&gt;.  [COBIT is the first tool I reach for, not ITIL].  It is marching into ITIL&#039;s space with superior fire power.  So wake up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit5-another-step-closer-itil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit5-another-step-closer-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1874</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1874 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT is a useful tool for much more than Audit</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-useful-tool-much-more-audit</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When I presented my &quot;layman&#039;s view of COBIT&quot; to the local chapter of itSMF some time back, the main point I wanted to make was that COBIT has many practical uses - only one of them is audit.  This is reflected in the changing makeup of the ISACA membership: auditors are now a minority.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-useful-tool-much-more-audit&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-useful-tool-much-more-audit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1567</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1567 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>COBIT 5 draft Design document available for public comment</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-draft-design-document-available-public-com</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ISACA have published &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.isaca.org/Template.cfm?Section=Home&amp;amp;CONTENTID=56398&amp;amp;TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a draft design document of COBIT 5&lt;/a&gt; for your comment.  If you have an interest in IT management, ITSM or governance you should read it and provide feedback.  Here&#039;s what I will be saying.  What about you?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-draft-design-document-available-public-com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/cobit-5-draft-design-document-available-public-com#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1845</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1845 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
