<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - wikipedia</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/199/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Manipulating open content to commercial ends on Wikipedia - the ITIL entry</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/manipulating-open-content-commercial-ends-wikipedi</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic is all for capitalism.   I welcome people making a buck on the internet.  Unfortunately as we have seen previously Wikipedia doesn&#039;t, and commerically orented sites are drummed out (unless they are magazine sites with ads, or a big vendor&#039;s white papers, or a number of other inexplicable exceptions).  So what&#039;s with these two ITIL sites? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/manipulating-open-content-commercial-ends-wikipedi&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/manipulating-open-content-commercial-ends-wikipedi#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/199">wikipedia</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1392</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 03:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1392 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
