http://www.itskeptic.org/node/89 Comments for "Announcing the Inaugural IT Skeptic Awards for 2006" en http://www.itskeptic.org/node/89#comment-8069 <p>More <a href="http://leadinganswers.typepad.com/leading_answers/2011/04/lies-damn-lies-and-statistics.html" target="_blank">criticism of the Standish reports here</a> <small>(thanks <a href="http://www.twitter.com/PeterKretzman" target="_blank">Peter</a> and <a href="http://www.twitter.com/DaveG253" target="_blank">Dave</a>)</small>, milder than <a href="http://www.umsl.edu/~sauterv/analysis/Standish/glass." target="_blank">Glass's article</a> but still questioning the data.</p> <p><a href="http://www.itskeptic.org/node/544" target="-blank">Like almost all IT analyst reports</a>, the Standish reports are crap science</p> Sat, 30 Apr 2011 01:07:06 +0000 skeptic comment 8069 at http://www.itskeptic.org http://www.itskeptic.org/node/89#comment-386 <p>Thanks for giving away your awards. They are a nice read and gave me a smile on my first workday in the new year. I am still bubbeling inside about the CHIP.</p> Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:56:06 +0000 buzina comment 386 at http://www.itskeptic.org