<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;ITIL V3 Intermediate exams - the money engine wins again&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/664</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;ITIL V3 Intermediate exams - the money engine wins again&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The trainers dilemma</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/664#comment-3125</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Being fair to trainers they face the dilemma that they, and their companies, are primarily judged on their pass rate. The market is very competitive which makes it difficult for anyone to break ranks and deliver a value adding course at greater cost.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 08:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JamesFinister</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3125 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ha... I thought it was the</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/664#comment-3122</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ha... I thought it was the case for the most part. At least with my trainers. Too focused on high scores to be able to market themselves &quot;better&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Timo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3122 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Focus of training</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/664#comment-3104</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Plus how long before trainers train students to pass the exam, not to expose them to the wider subject matter&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JamesFinister</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3104 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>V3 Intermediates</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/664#comment-3102</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;There are 2 other things that bother me here as well (wearing both my trainer and examiner hats).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) All 8 questions will have to be perfect - there is no room here for slightly ambiguous answers.  With the foundation exam, you can always point out to students that even if there a couple of strangely worded questions, they are still going to be able to pass.  One dodgy question here could be the difference between pass or fail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Security - how long will it be before all training organisations have anecdotal versions of the questions.  Particularly when all trainers have to sit the exam - it won&#039;t be long before 100% pass rates can be pretty much guaranteed.  It reminds me of a section from the novel the Secret History - the end of term exam for Invariant Subspaces has a question that is two pages long - but the answer is always &#039;yes&#039; and that&#039;s all you need to know to pass!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not a Version 3 hater by any means, but I think we have some continual service improvement yet to come.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Claire&lt;br /&gt;
claire.hicks@itiltrainingzone.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Claire H</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3102 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
