<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;What do the IT Skeptic readers feel about the ITIL v3 exams?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/459</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;What do the IT Skeptic readers feel about the ITIL v3 exams?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Any service that registers one third dissatisfaction </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/459#comment-3733</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have no idea what bias you are criticising.  I said &quot;those of you who are unhappy about the ITIL v3 exams are a (vocal) minority - the majority of punters are happy with their investment.&quot;  which I think is an unbiased assessment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any service that registers one third dissatisfaction is in serious trouble.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are trolling.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3733 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stats eh?! You could also</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/459#comment-3731</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Stats eh?! You could also have stated that only 32% (less than 1/3) were dissatisfied.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When presenting the facts, one should leave one&#039;s own biases at the door :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3731 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>just want the ticket</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/459#comment-2316</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I do audit for clusters of IP addresses, but vote stacking within 300 votes isn&#039;t hard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand I&#039;m prepared to believe that there is a silent majority who just want the ticket.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2316 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I could not summarise my thoughts into a simple vote!</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/459#comment-2314</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have sat and passed both the full Foundation V3 and the Managers Bridge. I passed both. So, I was happy with the result. I had no course for the Foundation, but I teach it, and think the syllabus severely lacking. I attended a trainers-only event for the manager&#039;s bridge, which was stimulating, friendly, enjoyable, but we all had major criticisms of the syllabus, and all thought the exam was a joke (but were moderated to a pass). Glad I passed, yes. Believe that this is a useful qualification - not sure. Believe that the exam is a good indicator of ability and knowledge - definitely not!&lt;br /&gt;
Liz Gallacher&lt;br /&gt;
Freelance Trainer and Consultant&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Liz Gallacher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2314 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Given the criticism of the</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/459#comment-2313</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Given the criticism of the exams on these pages it is an &#039;interesting&#039; result.&lt;br /&gt;
Are you sure Dr Julie Linden isn&#039;t involved somewhere?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2313 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
