<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;The key to living without CMDB is process maturity level&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/41</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The key to living without CMDB is process maturity level&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>CMDB in SMEs</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/41#comment-389</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Further to this, the NOEMI methodology decided that small business is so low on the maturity scale they invented new increments between 0 and 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The idea of setting up a CMDB at a maturity less than 1 is laughable.  Pragmatism dictates that Configuration Management boils down to a financial asset register and the rest stored as “him over there”: all the relationships and impact analysis are in someone’s head.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think this scales up into SME too.  You have to be a fairly substantial sized org before the economies of &quot;aurtomation&quot; as in a tool vs a person&#039;s head, kick in.  Otherwise the initial investment and the ongoing maintentance cost to keep it uncompromised and accurate far outweighs the risk of using &quot;wetware&quot; (a brain).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 09:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 389 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
