<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Event generating a change ?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/268</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Event generating a change ?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>automated change</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/268#comment-1235</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think you are being a bit harsh.  ST refers to &quot;changes arise... reactively as  a means of resolving errors and adapting to changing circumstances&quot; (p42) and &quot;tuning... reboot&quot; (p47).  it also covers &quot;operational change&quot; (p61).  It doesn&#039;t go into a lot of detail about _any_ sources so service operations is not a standout oversight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think you are on the edge of a bigger issue though: automated change gets no mention, yet in this era of Web Services, grid computing and so on, ITIL needs to be ready for dynamically self-healing and self-reconfiguring systems.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1235 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
