<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;All books 2.2.1 repeats service definition&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/264</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;All books 2.2.1 repeats service definition&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I made this into a new Known Error</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/264#comment-1220</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I made this into &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/265&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a new Known Error&lt;/a&gt;, with credit to Peter&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1220 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>alignment of chapter 2</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/264#comment-1219</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The chapter 2 in each book is indeed part of a duplication. It should describe it from a volume perspective: paragraph 2.4.3 should be the value of the volume to the business... (see service design). in SO it is a generic value. SS does not have the value to the business described. Better alignment between these values would be benficial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;
Peter Lijnse&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 23:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>PELIJN</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1219 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
