<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;The Web started the decline of privacy; it is the personal camera that really nails it dead.&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/web-started-decline-privacy-it-personal-camera-rea</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;The Web started the decline of privacy; it is the personal camera that really nails it dead.&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Slowly slowly you hear the rumble of the shift</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/web-started-decline-privacy-it-personal-camera-rea#comment-8728</link>
 <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Facebook [has] been willing to push the limits of privacy in ways that might be potentially creative and in ways that might potentially &lt;b&gt;create more value for us than we give up&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But none of the many reactions to Facebook get to the core of the problem, which isn&#039;t privacy at all. The real problem becomes visible when you look at it from the other direction. What effect does massive sharing have on the recipients?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interesting article: &lt;a href=&quot;http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/12/the-end-of-social.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The End of Social&lt;/a&gt; (via @chrisdancy)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8728 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
