<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;My how ITIL has grown: the size of the new ITIL V3 2011&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;My how ITIL has grown: the size of the new ITIL V3 2011&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>perish the thought</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comment-8368</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Of course perish the thought that anyone takes competitive advantage of advance access due to being a reviewer, or even ... gasp... gets advance access other ways.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There was that company who ran a pilot ITIL V3 Foundation course before the training industry even had the syllabus...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8368 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fast readers</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comment-8367</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is truly amazing how fast some readers are. I have already seen a rather comprehensive comparison of all changes. Reading close to 2000 pages in one day and even comparing it to the previous vers.. sorry edition is quite an achievement. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Guess a) is the writer an ITIL trainer and b) was the report quite positive. I&#039;m quite sure you all guessed right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aale&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aroos</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8367 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>minor </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comment-8327</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As Arjen Droog points out on Twitter, the size increase says nothing about the extent of the revision to the existing pages as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8327 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dense and thick</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comment-8325</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When you use terms like Density and Thickness regarding ITIL and OGC, I think of things other than the size of a book.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&lt;br /&gt;
BobGrins&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bobgrins</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8325 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Size does matter</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comment-8324</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;More pages, heavier, does not mean more content.  At one stage I thought I read somewhere the books might be printed in a small more compact format - if so that would account for the extra pages.  Not sure how to account for the weight except to say that 4.459kg divided by 1343 pages = @3.32g /page.  6.981kg divided by 1,959 pages is about @3.56g/page.  So I can only suspect the density of ink is greater, or the page thicker?  Perhaps more text than diagrams - who knows.  Size and weight may matter to some, perhaps those who resell and ship, but I would value more a list of new concepts in each volume - perhaps a table of contents????&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ianclayton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8324 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Heavier books = harder to throw.</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comment-8323</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This is comforting to know that it&#039;ll be easier to throw the ITIL V3 &quot;refresh&quot; books at the OGC compared to when &quot;ITIL 2012&quot; arrives and people start throwing 2011 at them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8323 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Kilos</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/my-how-itil-has-grown-size-new-itil-v3-2011#comment-8321</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rather an extra of more than 2.5 kilos.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Un saludo,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pablo&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8321 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
