<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Stand up IT Skeptics&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Stand up IT Skeptics&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Thanks for this- it is a</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics#comment-8317</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this- it is a missing part of the field.  I may not agree w/ you point-by-point, but I like the way you think.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tko</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8317 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Skep - RE:
Change at a human</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics#comment-8291</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Skep - RE:&lt;br /&gt;
Change at a human pace&lt;br /&gt;
TR:  completely agree - I found that always seeking out the WIIFM increases the chances of good change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Respect for the wisdom and knowledge the race has accumulated over millennia&lt;br /&gt;
TR: I like the below incremental steps.&lt;br /&gt;
DATA + PURPOSE = INFORMATION&lt;br /&gt;
INFORMATION + CULTURE = KNOWLEDGE&lt;br /&gt;
KNOWLEDGE + EXPERIENCE &amp;amp; REFLECTION = WISDOM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Integrity in advice and solutions: changes that are genuinely in the best interests of those they are being sold to and imposed upon.&lt;br /&gt;
TR: Agree absolutely.  One can consult with integrity if they are willing to put the customer&#039;s interests before their own (few do).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Curiousity tempered by caution. Critical analysis of anything new.&lt;br /&gt;
TR: Simple answer is having a stake in the end outcome.  Be there for BizCase review down the track (even get paid that way).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Quality without dogma or perfectionism.&lt;br /&gt;
TR: 2 things: SOME sort of measure is important.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (customer/consumer) - respect that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom Rankin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8291 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>define fast</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics#comment-8263</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A business model may sometimes vanish quickly but a business seldom does.  And the principles of business don&#039;t.  You still have to create value, generate cash, make a profit, manage risk.   Anything else is speculation (usually with someone else&#039;s money)... or fraud.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Define &quot;fast&quot;.  The internet has been with us for 20 years, mobile phones for 10.  Amazon is rolling the publishing industry, but it is taking it decades to do it.  The internet knocked the travel agents&#039; industry sideways, but the best survive.  Our copper-based telco is still a fat ugly giant. CD shops are finally disappearing in some countries.  America still wants a paper &lt;strike&gt;cheque&lt;/strike&gt;... er &quot;check&quot;.  Disney and Murdoch still rule.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8263 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>about time</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics#comment-8262</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;classical conservatism applied to information technology&quot;.  It&#039;s not ironic, it&#039;s about bloody time.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We in IT blow mega-millions on failed projects while engineers build Dubai without a failure.  They might look radical and exciting,but those extreme buildings are not built on some analyst&#039;s bright idea.  They&#039;re built on conservative application of proven science.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/cloud-distraction-its-day-job&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;accused our industry&lt;/a&gt; of being &quot;an undisciplined rabble of kids who run out the gate to dance shrieking around anything shiny or noisy that comes along the road.&quot;  No-one has disputed the description.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/imagepicker/1/chasing_canstockphoto0317682.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Image&quot;  width=&quot;300&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8262 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Classical conservativism</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics#comment-8261</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rob, no offense but you sound like you&#039;re channelling &lt;a href=&#039;http://www-student.unl.edu/cis/hist101w03/online_course/unit3/lsn11-tp03.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Edmund Burke&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve always appreciated this bit: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;By this wise prejudice we are taught to look with horror on those children of their country, who are prompt rashly to hack that aged parent in pieces, and put him into the kettle of magicians...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So not necessarily a bad thing, but still it&#039;s a bit ironic to hear classical conservatism applied to information technology. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Charles T. Betz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.erp4it.com&quot; title=&quot;http://www.erp4it.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.erp4it.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charles T. Betz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8261 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great idea</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics#comment-8260</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Like the idea. Here are a few comments:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* Rules can sometimes change fast. Latest Fortune magazine has some examples how a business model vanished quickly because of new technology. But it is also true that many rules don&#039;t change even if the environment or technology changes.&lt;br /&gt;
* Maybe you should remove internet from the hype list. I don&#039;t think it was over-hyped&lt;br /&gt;
* Theoretical approach can be complicated but not always. I studied mathematics at University and still remember with pleasure the one time when the teacher commented that my solution to an exercise was more elegant than his. Theory can be elegant and simple and very useful if verified with empirical evidence. I agree that some theoretical work is just scientific bull. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aale&lt;br /&gt;
PS Working in my summer office, balmy 26C here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aroos</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8260 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>M&amp;M</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/stand-it-skeptics#comment-8259</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Would the real IT skeptic please stand up?  The more experience I have, the more I see the last 5 bullets holding true.  I&#039;d like that etched into my MacBook.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Beran</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8259 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
