<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Cloned logos&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cloned-logos</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Cloned logos&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>bravely persisting</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cloned-logos#comment-7883</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;OGC are bravely persisting with the onanist.  Stiff upper lip and all that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sure all sorts of creative interpretations could be made from the OCEG logo.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7883 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>OGC hasn&#039;t changed yet?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/cloned-logos#comment-7881</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I didn&#039;t realise the OGC were still using the &quot;man feeding the chickens&quot; logo. I thought they would&#039;ve moved onto something else quick smart. Good to see OCEG didn&#039;t fall into the same trap.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stewart Johnson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7881 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
