<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;BMC are at the old bait and switch again over CMDB&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-old-bait-and-switch-again-over-cmdb</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;BMC are at the old bait and switch again over CMDB&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ring-in</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/bmc-are-old-bait-and-switch-again-over-cmdb#comment-7160</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It occurs to me that i have wrongly labelled this &quot;bait and switch&quot;.  Bait and switch is when they promise you the Maclaren then sell you a Diahatsu.  While there is some of that here, this is more that they promise you a Maclaren, measure the track time of a Daihatsu to prove it works, then sell you a Maclaren that is too hard for you to drive or maintain.  The Aussies call that a &quot;ring-in&quot; when a different horse runs under the colours of another.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;it seems to me that most of the benefits credited to CMDB in most cases are in fact benefits of the much simpler asset management.  have a list of assets.  Track location, warranties, number of licenses, lease expirations, and depreciation.  Huge returns on little investments, and none of it requires the 6-lite V12, twin-turbo, carbon-fibre-and-titanium-alloy, computer-controlled technology and 20-man pit crew of a CMDB.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7160 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
