<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Microsoft screws me, Google seduces me&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-innovates-while-microsoft-bullies</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Microsoft screws me, Google seduces me&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Inevitable</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-innovates-while-microsoft-bullies#comment-6041</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think it is inevitable that some of those channels will die...and that other alternatives will appear. Wave is very clunky as things stand, socially as well as technically. If it gets better it could well have a place as a replacement that combines the best of Twitter and Linkedin groups, but there is a danger it will also be abused in the same way as Linkedin groups, and be as irrelevant as much Twitter traffic is. I would agree with David and Aale that the ITSM debates on wave so far have been very productive though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JamesFinister</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6041 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>pull it all together</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-innovates-while-microsoft-bullies#comment-6040</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;so we have discussion going on in articles, papers, blogs, comments, forums, linkedin groups, twitter and now wave.  Methinks a little rationalisation is going to be required.  perhaps Wave can pull it all together&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6040 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Joining the wave</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-innovates-while-microsoft-bullies#comment-6038</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rob, and others&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seriously I think there is some useful ITSM debate going on in Google wave,involving the usual suspects, whilst at the same time the time  over head to process it is considerably less than with Twitter. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://completewaveguide.com/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JamesFinister</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6038 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;ll wait</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-innovates-while-microsoft-bullies#comment-6031</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks David, but I have a Wave account.   I&#039;ve watched all the how-to videos and tried using it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For now I&#039;ll wait until someone more inventive than me sees more in it than a realtime chat page with attachments&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6031 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Invite available</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/google-innovates-while-microsoft-bullies#comment-6028</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rob,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As I mentioned in another note (CMDB thread), I have an invite I&#039;ll be happy to make available to you, if you&#039;ll commit to using it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Btw, I don&#039;t know if Google Wave will be great.  What I&#039;ve said is that I can see lots of extraordinary possibilities and potential for the tool.  I&#039;m not in charge of execution or budgets, so as good as it looks, it may turn out to fizzle.  :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;David&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>DavidM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6028 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
