<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Vendors should get a vote too?  What do you think?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/144</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Vendors should get a vote too?  What do you think?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A vendor&#039;s marketing department will incite staff</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/144#comment-620</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A vendor&#039;s marketing department will incite staff by telling how the evil site has blocked the domain so they need to use their home connections.   It might just make it worse.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even if one asks vendors not to vote, they can still persuade one friend or family each.  Sigh.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As in most web security, nothing will stop them if they really want to.  One just hopes it will be obvious.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will have to market it hard and hope to get a big enough pool to swamp the vendor effect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S. It&#039;s not a poll I&#039;m planning: it is a type of reviews.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 620 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s not the voters, it&#039;s the questions</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/144#comment-618</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dear IT Skeptic,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether or not the vendor rigs the voting by stuffing the electronic ballot box with employees is the least of your worries. The problem with polls and e-surveys is not the voters but the people who develop the questions. The pseudo-science of polling for politics and other pursuits has long since been hampered by leading questions that do not explore all reasonable options in a voter&#039;s mind or that lead to erroneous conclusions. The standard example is those opinion polls that say &quot;do you approve of the job right-wing Candidate X is doing?&quot; 70% of the respondents say &#039;no&#039; and the polling firm then concludes that the public now supports the left-wing Candidate Y. But wait. The assumption is that if you do not approve of Candidate X&#039;s position, your opinion must be closer to Candidate Y&#039;s. That is often not the case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So too with our ITSM voter polls. The devil is in the details of the questions which, to be effective, need to be, literally, scientific. If you can get a sensical developer of quality questions then the problem of vote-rigging is a lay-up. Just block out the vendor domain. Frankly, if the vendor is half-smart they will WANT to have their domain blocked because a well-designed set of questions combined with a large survey response pool will provide them, for free, far more insightful information than they could acquire otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;
MD&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mike Drapeau</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 618 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
