<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;ITIL Incident, is there a better word for it?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;ITIL Incident, is there a better word for it?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>incidents, issues and big bad bogeymen</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4939</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue has too many hidden meanings in UK.&lt;br /&gt;
Issues are things that Civil Servants and other public sector staff refer to when they talk about problems as in &quot;we have issues with hiding our excessive costs; there are too many staff with issues. The more excessively sub-normal managers try to substiute the word with &quot;challenges&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, Issues are summarised by the lyrics of last years non-hit by the group Saturdays  to wit:&lt;br /&gt;
Me and my heart we got issues&lt;br /&gt;
Don&#039;t know if i should hate you or miss you&lt;br /&gt;
Damn i wish that i could resist you&lt;br /&gt;
Can&#039;t decide if i should slap you or kiss you,&lt;br /&gt;
Me and my heart we got issues,issues,issues&lt;br /&gt;
We got issues issues issues.&lt;br /&gt;
Try substituting the word issues with incidents, challenges, problems and opportunites in turn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the word incident is not acceptable then try some completely arbitrary, abstract and anodyne term?&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps a really teeny weeny incident (event?) not yet logged by IM could be a Bambi.&lt;br /&gt;
When it goes to IM but before prioritisng it could be a Goldilocks.&lt;br /&gt;
After prioritisng then you may want multi-levels depending on the impact and urgency  e.g.&lt;br /&gt;
A &quot;can&#039;t be bothered to do anything&quot; is a Goody;&lt;br /&gt;
A &quot;think I might cope with this without a grown-up to help me&quot; is a Trevor (or Tracey)&lt;br /&gt;
A really major incident as in &quot;this is a bad bogie, I can&#039;t cope&quot; becomes a Humphrey. A Humphrey would go to Problem Management -or Challenge, Issue or Opportunity Management as preferred and depending on the preceived positive or negative implications. But let&#039;s not offend anyone&lt;br /&gt;
That&#039;s enough for me today, I should still be asleep&lt;br /&gt;
Regards&lt;br /&gt;
Nairda&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nairda </dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4939 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Better word for incident</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4938</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m working for a company, whoch is offering a so called &quot;IT Operations Autopilot&quot;, a piece of software that is able to dynamically apply predefined rules based on an IT model (cmdb-data) and monitoring metrics and events. To describe &#039;events&#039; inside this Autopilot we had to find a correct wording, because &#039;events&#039; is a technical term used in connection with monitoring, while the term &#039;incident&#039; is, as said before, focussing more on the processes. We decided to use the term &#039;Issue&#039;, which for us seem to be neutral in all resprects:&lt;br /&gt;
To sum up, whats happening and to get some feedback from you, if our wording makes sense:&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring data or events become an &#039;issue&#039; (a case within our Autopilot-software), and might be forwarded to the service desk or ticketing system, where it becomes an incident (either resolved automatically, because there were rules successfully applied, or to be handled manually, because the Autopilot was not able to fix the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Roland&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Roland Judas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4938 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I suggested issue but my</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4886</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I suggested issue but my post has vanished. I thought it might be failure at my end but I&#039;m getting subscriptions for this thread. I suppose there might be an underlying cause or problem but right now I have an issue not an incident.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>riCh chestMat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4886 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>somethign that is</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4876</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Happening, departure and episode all suffer from the same drawback as incident; they imply something happened. Anomaly is nice because it covers both something that happened and somethign that is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4876 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Incident</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4874</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;i think you&#039;ll struggle to better Incident.&lt;br /&gt;
Happening, anomaly, departure and perhaps episode are close.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mummymonkey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4874 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>confusing</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4855</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That might be a trifle confusing... or are you suggesting an event and an incident are the same thing?  Not as ITIL defines &quot;event&quot; they aren&#039;t.  And the ITIL concept is a useful one&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4855 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Incident</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4854</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How about &quot;event&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4854 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How about &quot;exception&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4849</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How about &quot;exception&quot; or &quot;variance&quot;?  Hmm I&#039;m getting back to &quot;deviation&quot;...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4849 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Incident, a better name?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4848</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;looking to the fact: &quot;trouble&quot; or &quot;inconvenience&quot;, even if they are dictionary equivalent. &quot;Block&quot; or &quot;abnormal situation&quot; (too long) if we think to the effect on user. We would need more imagination, as incident is not too bad&lt;br /&gt;
Fed&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fed</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4848 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>specific </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4846</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Antonio&lt;br /&gt;
No those are too long to be useful [joking]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Agree  that &quot;call&#039;&#039; and &quot;ticket&quot; are generic terms of which incident is one class.  We need a word specific to incident&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4846 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>disagree</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4845</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Humm, altough I use the term a lot, it&#039;s more a synonym for &quot;user interaction&quot; or even &quot;ticket&quot; or &quot;call chase&quot;...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An incident can be a service call category...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think that an incident means &quot;the user can not do hist work because your f***ng IT servce is not working properly&quot;, and it is not &quot;the user is not much happy because your f***ng IT Service is not performing as agreed&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Antonio Valle&lt;br /&gt;
G2, Gobierno y Gestión de TI&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gedos.es&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>avallesalas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4845 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>LOL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4844</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;:-D&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What about &quot;non conformity&quot;  (or however you say it in english!)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Antonio Valle&lt;br /&gt;
G2, Gobierno y Gestión de TI&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gedos.es&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>avallesalas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4844 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL heretic</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4842</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Although I gathered my fair share of ITIL certifications, I dare to use the term &quot;service call&quot; quite a lot. It is free from any positive or negative aura, and combines well with the ITIL term &quot;service desk&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Stefan dH</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4842 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>deviation?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4839</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;thoughts of rubber and coconut oil and maid&#039;s uniforms and ...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4839 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What about...</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/itil-incident-there-better-word-it#comment-4837</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Deviation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(aligns with ISO 9000)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Geir Isene</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4837 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
