<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Virtualization: the black box bomb&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Virtualization: the black box bomb&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Not petulant</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb#comment-5187</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hang on there! The system only existed because there was a business need. It was built by an IT guy, the business did not manage it or it&#039;s lifetime. The IT guy left - no-one said he sulked - lot&#039;s of guys just retire. It&#039;s a business problem. They took their quick satisfaction and then dropped it, it came back to bite, but they never managed it&#039;s lifetime. No? Why are you so cranky?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5187 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>petulant</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb#comment-5182</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You&#039;re being entirely unprofessional, as well as childish and petulant.  IT is constantly faced with bad decisions by the business.  these arise from poor communications on both sides, and a failure to understand IT which is a failure by both sides again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stomping off to sulk is not in the interests of the organisation that pays you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5182 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That situation exists because...</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb#comment-5174</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;... IT &#039;resource&#039; was snubbed by business. IT guy sat it out and then left. Business owns it now. Business problem from beginning to end - what&#039;s the business going to do? Tough titty I say.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5174 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>you&#039;re lucky</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/virtualization-black-box-bomb#comment-5082</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If you have managed to get this &quot;black box&quot; virtualized you are luckier than most, in many datacenters there is one cabinet that from the outside looks like any other....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but beware....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;once you open it up there sits a (insert an old OS) server (or 4) no-one understands/knows the passwords/understands why they need modems, secretly the replacement hardware for this device is purchased via expenses over ebay, and when the row is required to be powered down for maintenence... a power cable appears to maintain this cabinet as no-one is sure the disks will spin up again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course I joke, this wouldn&#039;t be possible in this day and age...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>supportthought</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5082 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
