skeptic's blog

Riddle me this: matching ITIL theory to the real world

Calling all you ITIL theorists, philosophers, pontificators and pundits. Marty is back: our follower from the real world, trying to make sense of ITIL on its home grounds, the operations of big iron batch computing. Marty asks what happens after a service is restored? What does ITIL call the function of undoing the damage done while a service was unavailable? I have a view - of course - but I'm going to stay quiet - for a while- and hear what everyone else thinks. So have at it.

Using ITIL effectively

[Updated 18/10/2011] Yesterday I blogged about a request from a reader for advice on service catalogue. It must be a week for it because another reader asked about using ITIL (or ITSM in general) effectively.

Service Catalogue in a nutshell

A reader asked for advice on Service Catalogue. Here's my "Service Catalogue in a nutshell":

Service Assurance and the pursuit of the elusive service view

I learned a new (for me) buzzword recently when a journalist asked me about "Service Assurance". Sounds like a new spin on an old idea: the single view of a service. This is yet another techno-geek wet dream.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery

There's yet another service desk product banging away: this one is called cmdbcloud, a less than obvious name for a sevice desk. But it is. And if it is true that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, then they are trying hard to flatter a pre-existing SaaS service desk offering: Beetil.

Serious contributions from the IT Skeptic

It's not all satire and scorn for the IT Skeptic. At times he comes up with some serious contributions to the ITSM community. Lately these include a series of 6 webinars for ManageEngine. (You can view the previous webinars there).

Does ITIL explain the difference between an Alert and an Event?

Help me please. I'm thrashing around in the morass of Service Operation, trying to get crystal clear on the difference/relationship between an Alert and an Event. Anyone?

P.S. we did skirt around this discussion before

CMDB is like a linked digital phonebook, and just as pointless for most

In the old days a phonebook was a list of names and numbers, like an asset database.

Now we have numbers on phones, with people search. Say I want to ring Gary at Safeness. I don't have a number for him but I know his company, and for others at that company I have the switchboard number. Wouldn't it be cool if people were linked to a company entity and we recorded the company numbers once for that entity so it could be found for everyone in that company?

Now we have the analogous equivalent of a CMDB (or a normalised database for the old farts amongst us).

ITIL 2011 persists with the dangerous concept of supporting services

Not only has ITIL V3.1 2011 not fixed the problems with business-vs-technical services, they have gone the wrong way and reinforced the problem. I will fight to the death to say there is no such thing as internal supporting "services", because I care about ITSM.

Tipu: continual service improvement as a real approach to ITSM

At the recent itSMF Australian National Conference (a.k.a. LEADit, a top conference) I delivered a keynote on Tipu, my "agile ITSM" approach to continual service improvement, which garnered some positive feedback. The same day I was interviewed by the itSMF's journalist, and we spoke about CSI as an approach from the start; processes are the wrong granularity; how we must align to the business need; ETF and pragmatism; and most of all the need for change at a human pace. Here is that interview (7 minutes):

Syndicate content